A Board can receive comprehensive risk reports, review dashboards of green indicators and track hundreds of completed actions, yet still lack a clear answer to one fundamental question: is risk being managed effectively?
As financial services firms navigate evolving regulatory expectations and plan for 2027, the challenge is moving beyond reporting frameworks, controls and remediation activity, to demonstrating that risk insight is informing business decisions, reducing exposure and delivering measurable improvements.
Square 4 Partners’ latest article examines six regulatory priorities that should be on every management agenda. It explores how weaknesses in management information, governance and control effectiveness can create a false sense of confidence, and what Boards and executive teams should be asking, to ensure their approach to risk management is effective in practice.
What you will find in the report:
- The six regulatory priorities: What firms need to consider across Consumer Duty, operational and cyber resilience, financial crime and fraud, governance and accountability, AI and innovation, and regulatory simplification and growth.
- Five questions for Boards and executive teams: A practical framework for assessing whether firms are identifying the right risks, challenging management information, acting on findings, directing investment effectively and maintaining clear accountability.
- What good risk management looks like in practice: The key questions leaders should ask under each regulatory priority to identify weaknesses, test whether controls are working and confirm that remedial action is delivering measurable improvements.
- From regulatory expectations to better decisions: How firms can use reliable data, effective challenge and clear accountability to strengthen decision-making, improve resilience and focus investment on the risks that matter most
If you are having any trouble downloading the PDF, email hello@square4.com.
Download
